Digital assets in prenup disclosure and property clauses

• Andrew B. v. Abbie B., 494 P.3d 522 (Alaska 2021) · Ordinary contract interpretation applies, but a court may not add a benefit, fund, or promise the parties did not make merely to repair a one-sided agreement.
• Compton v. Compton, 902 P.2d 805 (Alaska 1995) · A valid prenup is persuasive but not conclusive evidence of intent to keep property separate; a court may examine the parties' treatment of particular assets and find transmutation while the agreement remains valid.
• Alaska Stat. § 13.12.213 · A surviving spouse may waive elective-share, homestead, exempt-property, and family-allowance rights before or after marriage in a signed writing; the statute preserves voluntariness and execution-time unconscionability plus disclosure, written-waiver, and knowledge safeguards.
• Goodwin v. Goodwin, 592 So. 2d 212 (Ala. 1991) · Goodwin construes section 43-8-72 and confirms that the scope of a surviving spouse's waiver depends on the agreement's language, including whether an all-rights clause reaches statutory benefits and pre-waiver testamentary benefits.
• Ark. Code Ann. § 9-11-401; 1987 Ark. Acts 715, § 1 · A premarital agreement is a written agreement between prospective spouses made in contemplation of marriage; property includes broad present, future, income, and earnings interests.
• C.R.S. § 14-2-302 · Colorado defines premarital and marital agreements, amendment, marital rights, property, records, and signatures, including electronic records and signatures.
• Arlotta v. Arlotta, A24A0961 (Ga. Ct. App. Oct. 30, 2024) · Arlotta described the Scherer criteria as the governing enforceability framework and reversed a ruling that invalidated property and alimony limits merely because they differed from statutory default remedies.
• O.C.G.A. § 19-3-66 · Georgia provides for equitable enforcement of an antenuptial agreement at the instance of the marriage parties and, after death, specified offspring or heirs under the referenced probate and equity provisions.
• Haw. Rev. Stat. § 572D-1 · Hawaii defines a premarital agreement as an agreement between prospective spouses made in contemplation of marriage and effective upon marriage, and defines property broadly to include present, future, legal, equitable, vested, contingent, real, personal, income, and earnings interests.
• Idaho Code § 32-921 · Idaho defines a premarital agreement as an agreement between prospective spouses made in contemplation of marriage and effective upon marriage, and defines property broadly to include present, future, legal, equitable, vested, contingent, real, personal, income, and earnings interests.
• Ind. Code §§ 31-11-3-2 to -3 · Indiana defines a premarital agreement as an agreement between prospective spouses made in contemplation of marriage and effective upon marriage, and defines property broadly to include present, future, legal, equitable, vested, contingent, real, personal, income, and earnings interests.
• K.S.A. § 23-2402 · Kansas defines a premarital agreement as one between prospective spouses made in contemplation of marriage and effective upon marriage, and defines property to include present, future, legal, equitable, vested, contingent, real, personal, income, and earnings interests.
• In re Marriage of Nelson, 58 Kan. App. 2d 920, 475 P.3d 1284 (2020) · Nelson applies whole-document construction to an unambiguous premarital agreement and held that unambiguous joint-tenancy deeds controlled without parol evidence used to impeach their written terms.
• Chenault v. Chenault, 799 S.W.2d 575 (Ky. 1990) · Kentucky construes the actual trigger and operative language; Chenault treated its agreement as directed to death rather than divorce, so labels and general recitals cannot replace close textual analysis.
• Gentry v. Gentry, 798 S.W.2d 928 (Ky. 1990); Ky. Rev. Stat. § 403.190(2)(d) · Parties may define rights in property they own at marriage or later acquire, and Gentry enforced the exact ownership allocation including jointly titled property rather than substituting a generic separate-property result.
• Lawson v. Loid, 896 S.W.2d 1 (Ky. 1995) · Kentucky has long recognized premarital agreements intended to operate at death, but the scope of any dower, elective, or estate-right release and the disclosure record must be proved.
• Crow v. Crow, 56,445-CA (La. App. 2 Cir. Nov. 19, 2025) · Crow affirmed enforcement after finding insufficient proof of error and explained that joint tax filing or acquiring property during marriage did not automatically convert the agreed separate-property regime.
• La. Civ. Code art. 2332 · A matrimonial agreement affects third persons as to immovables when filed in the conveyance records where the property is situated and as to movables when filed where the spouses are domiciled.
• DeMatteo v. DeMatteo, 436 Mass. 18, 762 N.E.2d 797 (2002) · An enforceable agreement remains a contract whose language, definitions, schedules, triggers, and integrated obligations must be construed.
• Matter of the Estate of Stacy, 96 Mass. App. Ct. 447, 136 N.E.3d 486 (2019) · Stacy enforced plain premarital language waiving claims to identified separate property at death and excluded it from the surviving spouse's intestate-share calculation.
• Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 209, § 26 · A clearly descriptive property schedule must be annexed, and the contract and schedule recorded before marriage or within ninety days afterward in the specified registry and where affected land lies.
• Cannon v. Cannon, 384 Md. 537, 865 A.2d 563 (2005); Herget v. Herget, 319 Md. 466, 573 A.2d 798 (1990) · Antenuptial agreements are contracts interpreted under Maryland's objective law of contract interpretation, with attention to the executed language, consideration, and objective intent.
• Md. Code, Fam. Law § 8-201(c)–(e) · Current definitions exclude property from family-home, family-use, or marital-property treatment when a valid agreement applies, subject to the exact subsection and asset.
• Md. Code, Est. & Trusts § 3-205 · A surviving spouse's election rights may be waived before or after marriage by a written contract, agreement, or waiver signed by the waiving party, with statutory consequences for broad all-rights language.

Matrix and list placement describes the records in PrenupsAI's current evidence packages. It does not rank legal strictness, predict enforceability, or mean that an unlisted state has no applicable rule. Open the cited sources to inspect the underlying authority.