PrenupsAI

NV · Manually written guide

Prenup laws in Nevada

Nevada's Uniform Premarital Agreement Act in Chapter 123A supplies formalities, content, effect, amendment, and enforcement provisions.NRS 123A.040NRS 123A.050(1)NRS 123A.080(1)(a)

The Nevada content section protects child-support rights, while the enforcement section directs attention to voluntariness and financial disclosure or knowledge.NRS 123A.050(1)NRS 123A.080(1)(a)

Evidence tiersection verified
Package versionnv-2026-07-22.3
Authorities16
Reviewed2026-07-22
Effective through2026-07-22
On this pageExecutionSubjects and limitsFinancial reviewExamplesQuestionsAuthorities

Formation and lifecycle

Execution requirements to investigate

formalities

Nevada writing and signature requirements

A Nevada premarital agreement must be in writing and signed by both parties and is enforceable without consideration.

NRS 123A.040
effective date

Nevada effect of marriage

A Nevada premarital agreement becomes effective upon marriage.

NRS 123A.060
amendment revocation

Nevada amendment and revocation formalities

After marriage, amendment or revocation requires a written agreement signed by the parties and is enforceable without consideration.

NRS 123A.070
effective date

Nevada enactment and historical-law checkpoint

Nevada enacted its Uniform Premarital Agreement Act in 1989; Sogg and Fick explain that an agreement entered before October 1, 1989 may be tested under the Act or Nevada's pre-Act common law.

1989 Nev. Stat. ch. 472 (A.B. 296); NRS 123A.010–.100

What the agreement addresses

Permitted subjects and legal limits

property

Nevada statutory definitions

Nevada defines a premarital agreement as an agreement between prospective spouses made in contemplation of marriage and effective upon marriage, and defines property broadly to include present, future, legal, equitable, vested, contingent, real, personal, income, and earnings interests.

NRS 123A.030
permitted subjects

Nevada permitted agreement subjects

Permitted subjects include property rights and control, disposition, alimony or support, estate-planning arrangements, life-insurance benefits, choice of law, and other personal rights and obligations not violating public policy or criminal law.

NRS 123A.050(1)
child support

Nevada child-support limitation

A Nevada premarital agreement may not adversely affect a child's right to support.

NRS 123A.050(2)
spousal support

Nevada standalone execution-time unconscionability ground

Nevada makes unconscionability when the agreement was executed a standalone unenforceability ground, and the court decides the issue as a matter of law.

NRS 123A.080(1)(b), (3)
public assistance

Nevada public-assistance support safeguard

A court may require support to the extent necessary to avoid public-assistance eligibility caused by an alimony, support, or maintenance modification or elimination at separation or dissolution.

NRS 123A.080(2)
void marriage

Nevada void-marriage rule

If a marriage is void, an otherwise premarital agreement is enforceable only as necessary to avoid an inequitable result.

NRS 123A.090
limitations

Nevada limitation-of-actions rule

Nevada tolls an applicable limitation period for a premarital-agreement claim during marriage while preserving equitable time defenses including laches and estoppel.

NRS 123A.100

Process evidence

Financial disclosure, voluntariness, counsel, and timing

voluntariness

Nevada voluntary-execution safeguard

The party resisting enforcement in Nevada bears the burden to prove that the agreement was not executed voluntarily.

NRS 123A.080(1)(a)
financial disclosure

Nevada disclosure, waiver, and knowledge branch

Nevada separately permits a challenger to prove all three disclosure conditions: no fair and reasonable disclosure before execution, no voluntary express written waiver of further disclosure, and no adequate knowledge of the other party's property or financial obligations.

NRS 123A.080(1)(c)
independent counsel

Nevada Supreme Court pre-Act enforcement framework

Sogg reviewed a pre-Act agreement de novo and invalidated it after considering independent-counsel opportunity, signing pressure, business sophistication, financial disclosure, and understanding of forfeited rights.

Sogg v. Nevada State Bank, 108 Nev. 308, 832 P.2d 781 (1992)
financial disclosure

Nevada Supreme Court pre-execution disclosure decision

Fick affirmed that the agreement's alimony-waiver provisions were unenforceable where the asset schedule was not supplied until after signing and marriage and the record did not establish adequate prior knowledge of the full assets and obligations.

Fick v. Fick, 109 Nev. 458, 851 P.2d 445 (1993)
voluntariness

Nevada Supreme Court burden and pleading decision

Kantor explains that section 123A.080 places the burden of proving statutory invalidity on the party resisting enforcement and held that the district court did not need to independently revisit validity after the wife admitted it in an amended answer.

Kantor v. Kantor, 116 Nev. 886, 8 P.3d 825 (2000)

Hypotheticals, not outcomes

Practical examples

These examples show how document facts can intersect with the cited sources. They do not predict a court result.

Example 01

The casino-business interest

A closely held hospitality interest is named but not valued, and related debt is unclear. Nevada's enforcement source makes property and obligation disclosure a central evidence issue.NRS 123A.080(1)(a)

Ask local counsel

What business and debt information was needed for fair and reasonable disclosure?

Example 02

The fixed child-support formula

The agreement sets a future child-support amount regardless of later income or needs. Nevada's content provision expressly preserves the child's support right.NRS 123A.050(1)

Ask local counsel

How should the child-related term be treated under current Nevada law?

Common starting points

Nevada prenup FAQs

Answers are deliberately scoped to the cited evidence package and should be checked against current law.

What is Nevada's formation rule?

Nevada Revised Statutes section 123A.040 supplies the cited writing and signature formalities.NRS 123A.040

Can a Nevada prenup adversely affect child support?

Section 123A.050 preserves a child's right to support from adverse contractual treatment.NRS 123A.050(1)

Which enforcement source applies?

Section 123A.080 supplies Nevada's cited voluntariness and financial safeguards.NRS 123A.080(1)(a)

Prepare for independent advice

Questions for a Nevada lawyer

Bring the agreement, every exhibit, prior drafts, disclosure records, and a signing timeline. Then use the source-linked questions as an interview guide.

  1. 01

    Does the document fit the statutory definition, and which interests fall within its property terms?NRS 123A.030

  2. 02

    Is the complete agreement, including every incorporated schedule, written and signed by both parties?NRS 123A.040

  3. 03

    Does each material clause fit a permitted and lawful subject?NRS 123A.050(1)

  4. 04

    Does any provision purport to adversely affect a child's support right?NRS 123A.050(2)

  5. 05

    Did the contemplated marriage occur, and when did the agreement become effective?NRS 123A.060

  6. 06

    Is every claimed amendment or revocation supported by the required signed writing?NRS 123A.070

  7. 07

    What admissible evidence bears on voluntary execution under section 123A.080 and Nevada decisions?NRS 123A.080(1)(a)

  8. 08

    Was the agreement unconscionable when executed under current Nevada law?NRS 123A.080(1)(b), (3)

  9. 09

    What evidence addresses every component of section 123A.080(1)(c)?NRS 123A.080(1)(c)

  10. 10

    Could the support term cause qualifying public-assistance eligibility?NRS 123A.080(2)

  11. 11

    How could marriage validity affect relief?NRS 123A.090

  12. 12

    How do tolling and equitable defenses affect the claim timeline?NRS 123A.100

  13. 13

    Which legal regime and historical text govern this agreement?1989 Nev. Stat. ch. 472 (A.B. 296); NRS 123A.010–.100

  14. 14

    How does the preserved negotiation, counsel, and disclosure record compare with Sogg?Sogg v. Nevada State Bank, 108 Nev. 308, 832 P.2d 781 (1992)

  15. 15

    Was fair disclosure or adequate knowledge established before execution, rather than supplied later?Fick v. Fick, 109 Nev. 458, 851 P.2d 445 (1993)

  16. 16

    Has validity been properly contested, and who bears each statutory burden?Kantor v. Kantor, 116 Nev. 886, 8 P.3d 825 (2000)

Inspect the evidence

Principal statutes and cases

Every citation label above resolves to one of these records. Open the linked authority and verify the current text with licensed counsel.

propertystatute

NRS 123A.030

Nevada statutory definitions

Nevada defines a premarital agreement as an agreement between prospective spouses made in contemplation of marriage and effective upon marriage, and defines property broadly to include present, future, legal, equitable, vested, contingent, real, personal, income, and earnings interests.

  • The section was added by 1989 Nevada Statutes chapter 472, section 3.
formalitiesstatute

NRS 123A.040

Nevada writing and signature requirements

A Nevada premarital agreement must be in writing and signed by both parties and is enforceable without consideration.

  • The statute does not add an acknowledgment or witness requirement; separate instrument or recording rules may still matter for particular assets.
permitted subjectsstatute

NRS 123A.050(1)

Nevada permitted agreement subjects

Permitted subjects include property rights and control, disposition, alimony or support, estate-planning arrangements, life-insurance benefits, choice of law, and other personal rights and obligations not violating public policy or criminal law.

  • Application remains fact-specific and requires current licensed-counsel review.
child supportstatute

NRS 123A.050(2)

Nevada child-support limitation

A Nevada premarital agreement may not adversely affect a child's right to support.

  • Application remains fact-specific and requires current licensed-counsel review.
effective datestatute

NRS 123A.060

Nevada effect of marriage

A Nevada premarital agreement becomes effective upon marriage.

  • Application remains fact-specific and requires current licensed-counsel review.
amendment revocationstatute

NRS 123A.070

Nevada amendment and revocation formalities

After marriage, amendment or revocation requires a written agreement signed by the parties and is enforceable without consideration.

  • Application remains fact-specific and requires current licensed-counsel review.
voluntarinessstatute

NRS 123A.080(1)(a)

Nevada voluntary-execution safeguard

The party resisting enforcement in Nevada bears the burden to prove that the agreement was not executed voluntarily.

  • Sogg supplies a qualified historical framework for agreements predating the Act; current counsel must not convert its fact-specific considerations into automatic statutory elements.
spousal supportstatute

NRS 123A.080(1)(b), (3)

Nevada standalone execution-time unconscionability ground

Nevada makes unconscionability when the agreement was executed a standalone unenforceability ground, and the court decides the issue as a matter of law.

  • This is a Nevada-specific departure from UPAA enactments that combine unconscionability with separate disclosure conditions; later hardship is not itself the statutory time point.
financial disclosurestatute

NRS 123A.080(1)(c)

Nevada disclosure, waiver, and knowledge branch

Nevada separately permits a challenger to prove all three disclosure conditions: no fair and reasonable disclosure before execution, no voluntary express written waiver of further disclosure, and no adequate knowledge of the other party's property or financial obligations.

  • The three subconditions are conjunctive. Fick emphasizes that required disclosure must precede execution and that a later-initialed schedule did not cure the record there.
public assistancestatute

NRS 123A.080(2)

Nevada public-assistance support safeguard

A court may require support to the extent necessary to avoid public-assistance eligibility caused by an alimony, support, or maintenance modification or elimination at separation or dissolution.

  • Application remains fact-specific and requires current licensed-counsel review.
void marriagestatute

NRS 123A.090

Nevada void-marriage rule

If a marriage is void, an otherwise premarital agreement is enforceable only as necessary to avoid an inequitable result.

  • Application remains fact-specific and requires current licensed-counsel review.
limitationsstatute

NRS 123A.100

Nevada limitation-of-actions rule

Nevada tolls an applicable limitation period for a premarital-agreement claim during marriage while preserving equitable time defenses including laches and estoppel.

  • Application remains fact-specific and requires current licensed-counsel review.
effective dateofficial guidance

1989 Nev. Stat. ch. 472 (A.B. 296); NRS 123A.010–.100

Nevada enactment and historical-law checkpoint

Nevada enacted its Uniform Premarital Agreement Act in 1989; Sogg and Fick explain that an agreement entered before October 1, 1989 may be tested under the Act or Nevada's pre-Act common law.

  • The session law supplies the enacted text; the October 1 checkpoint is stated in Fick, and agreements near enactment require counsel to verify effective-date and transition law.
independent counselcase reporter

Sogg v. Nevada State Bank, 108 Nev. 308, 832 P.2d 781 (1992)

Nevada Supreme Court pre-Act enforcement framework

Sogg reviewed a pre-Act agreement de novo and invalidated it after considering independent-counsel opportunity, signing pressure, business sophistication, financial disclosure, and understanding of forfeited rights.

  • Sogg allows a pre-Act agreement to be evaluated under the Act or Nevada common law; its presumption and factors must be confined to the historical and factual setting it addressed.
financial disclosurecase reporter

Fick v. Fick, 109 Nev. 458, 851 P.2d 445 (1993)

Nevada Supreme Court pre-execution disclosure decision

Fick affirmed that the agreement's alimony-waiver provisions were unenforceable where the asset schedule was not supplied until after signing and marriage and the record did not establish adequate prior knowledge of the full assets and obligations.

  • Fick concerned a pre-October 1, 1989 agreement and applied both the Act and Nevada common-law authorities; counsel must map its disclosure analysis to the current conjunctive text of section 123A.080(1)(c).
voluntarinesscase reporter

Kantor v. Kantor, 116 Nev. 886, 8 P.3d 825 (2000)

Nevada Supreme Court burden and pleading decision

Kantor explains that section 123A.080 places the burden of proving statutory invalidity on the party resisting enforcement and held that the district court did not need to independently revisit validity after the wife admitted it in an amended answer.

  • Kantor is primarily procedural and does not establish that a court may ignore a properly preserved statutory challenge.

Known boundaries

Package limitations

Continue researching

Related state guides

CACaliforniaAZArizonaUTUtah