New York
New York Domestic Relations Law sections 236(B)(1), 236(B)(3), and 240: execution and acknowledgment, property, maintenance, and child-related provisions.
- Tier
- section verified
- Authorities
- 5
- Reviewed
- 2026-07-18
Evidence-package comparison
New York's package begins with a deed-style acknowledgment formality, while Illinois uses a signed-writing rule and codifies disclosure, hardship, void-marriage, and limitations provisions in its uniform act.750 ILCS 10/3750 ILCS 10/7(a), (c)750 ILCS 10/7(b)750 ILCS 10/8750 ILCS 10/9N.Y. Dom. Rel. Law § 236(B)(3)
New York Domestic Relations Law sections 236(B)(1), 236(B)(3), and 240: execution and acknowledgment, property, maintenance, and child-related provisions.
Illinois Uniform Premarital Agreement Act, 750 ILCS 10/3–9: formalities, content, child support, amendment, enforcement, hardship, void marriages, and limitations.
Side-by-side source map
A blank topic is intentionally visible. The page never fills an uncatalogued state-law rule from general model knowledge.
An agreement made before or during marriage must be written, subscribed, and acknowledged or proven in the manner required for a deed to be recorded.
N.Y. Dom. Rel. Law § 236(B)(3)The current Illinois package does not encode this as a standalone source topic. That is a research gap, not a legal conclusion.
The current New York package does not encode this as a standalone source topic. That is a research gap, not a legal conclusion.
A premarital agreement must be written and signed by both parties.
750 ILCS 10/3The current New York package does not encode this as a standalone source topic. That is a research gap, not a legal conclusion.
Illinois addresses voluntary execution and an unconscionability framework involving disclosure, written waiver, and adequate knowledge.
750 ILCS 10/7(a), (c)Maintenance terms are subject to statutory cross-references and fairness/reasonableness and unconscionability language.
N.Y. Dom. Rel. Law § 236(B)(3)(3)A court may require support to avoid undue hardship from circumstances not reasonably foreseeable when a support provision was executed.
750 ILCS 10/7(b)The current New York package does not encode this as a standalone source topic. That is a research gap, not a legal conclusion.
An applicable limitations period is tolled during marriage while identified equitable defenses remain available.
750 ILCS 10/9Questions before comparing outcomes
Which state's law governs each disputed issue, and is the agreement's choice-of-law clause effective?
Where did the parties live, sign, marry, own property, and expect to perform the agreement?
Which current statutes and later cases are absent from either source-catalogued package?
What execution, counsel, disclosure, waiver, and financial-knowledge evidence can actually be proved?