New York
New York Domestic Relations Law sections 236(B)(1), 236(B)(3), and 240: execution and acknowledgment, property, maintenance, and child-related provisions.
- Tier
- section verified
- Authorities
- 5
- Reviewed
- 2026-07-18
Evidence-package comparison
New York's package begins with subscribed-and-acknowledged execution and issue-specific domestic-relations rules; Florida uses a detailed statutory act with writing, disclosure, support, public-assistance, and void-marriage provisions.Fla. Stat. § 61.079(3)Fla. Stat. § 61.079(7)(a)Fla. Stat. § 61.079(7)(b)N.Y. Dom. Rel. Law § 236(B)(3)N.Y. Dom. Rel. Law § 236(B)(3)(3)
New York Domestic Relations Law sections 236(B)(1), 236(B)(3), and 240: execution and acknowledgment, property, maintenance, and child-related provisions.
Florida Statutes section 61.079: formalities, content, child support, effect, amendment, enforcement, public assistance, and void marriages.
Side-by-side source map
A blank topic is intentionally visible. The page never fills an uncatalogued state-law rule from general model knowledge.
An agreement made before or during marriage must be written, subscribed, and acknowledged or proven in the manner required for a deed to be recorded.
N.Y. Dom. Rel. Law § 236(B)(3)The current Florida package does not encode this as a standalone source topic. That is a research gap, not a legal conclusion.
The current New York package does not encode this as a standalone source topic. That is a research gap, not a legal conclusion.
Florida addresses voluntary execution, fraud, duress, coercion, overreaching, and an unconscionability/disclosure framework.
Fla. Stat. § 61.079(7)(a)Maintenance terms are subject to statutory cross-references and fairness/reasonableness and unconscionability language.
N.Y. Dom. Rel. Law § 236(B)(3)(3)The current Florida package does not encode this as a standalone source topic. That is a research gap, not a legal conclusion.
The current New York package does not encode this as a standalone source topic. That is a research gap, not a legal conclusion.
A court may require support to avoid public-assistance eligibility caused by a support modification or elimination.
Fla. Stat. § 61.079(7)(b)Questions before comparing outcomes
Which state's law governs each disputed issue, and is the agreement's choice-of-law clause effective?
Where did the parties live, sign, marry, own property, and expect to perform the agreement?
Which current statutes and later cases are absent from either source-catalogued package?
What execution, counsel, disclosure, waiver, and financial-knowledge evidence can actually be proved?